Feb 272013
 

Since I wrote my first (and only, up to now) e-book (Citation Building Guide) about 3 months ago I’ve been having a lot of requests for additions and I’ve been receiving questions related to topics that for one reason or another are not covered in the current version of the e-book. That is why I decided to prepare a “second edition” of a sort. This second edition is scheduled to be issued on 18 March.

What will change and what will be added

Besides some changes to the structure of the content, there will be the following additions and updates:

1. Information about citation building in countries other than the United States – I have rightly been blamed that the guide focuses too much on the case of the US. And I agree. That is why there will be many improvements that could be beneficial to Internet marketers and regular businesses from the following countries:

- Canada
- United Kingdom
- Australia
- New Zealand
- Germany

2. Extended coverage of the data aggregators and Google’s trusted data providers – both in the US, and in the other countries mentioned above.

3. Case studies – diving deeper into specific complicated cases and the ways my team and I untangled them.

4. Updated “List of Business Directories for the US” and newly added “List of Business Directories for Canada”. The updated one would include both more business directories, and more information about why particular directories are excluded from the list. Note that both these lists include the direct URLs to the submission page of each website.

5. More “Phone Verification Guides”, including Google (universal), Yelp (universal), Bing (US), Nokia (US), LocalEze (US), Citysearch (US), Yellowbot (US), Yellowee (US), iBegin (US, Canada), YellowPages.ca (Canada), WebLocal (Canada).

6. Updated “Fixing and Reporting Duplicate Listings”, including more than 30 of the most important business directories.

How the price will change

The price will be increased, unfortunately. However, the good news is that if you purchase the guide by 17 March, 11:59PM (Eastern Standard Time) it will be at its current price (US$30) and you will enjoy free updates forever. I am planning to be updating it and adding more information to it at least twice a year (and even more often, in case some major changes occur). But the good news don’t end here. If you purchase the guide and send request for additions that haven’t been covered yet by 3 March, 11:59PM (EST), I will include them in the updated version.

Who should get the guide

The Citation Building Guide is suitable for the following groups:

- Internet marketing (and especially inbound marketing) agencies and specialists – the guide could help you in developing an organized system to deal with tedious tasks such as citations research, competitive citation analysis, and brute ones such as citation submission and citation building; it could also help you in training new staff to complete such tasks;

- Small and medium businesses – if you have a website and a Google Local listing, and you are wondering where to start from in order to make them more visible and to potentially monetize them, the e-book will guide you through the process;

- Franchises and chains targeting locally multiple areas – organizing the workflow and determining task priority are two of the most difficult problems for companies with many locations that try to make all of them visible and at the same time keep their brand image consistent; these are the problems the guide could help solving.

And besides all mentioned, you would have my personal assistance available in case you have troubles of any sort with the guide or its content.

You could read more about it and purchase it here.

Feb 072013
 

During my discussions with Ken Fagan an interesting question occurred: “How does one determine what business directory is a good citation source?” The obvious and shortest answer would be “Based on its quality.” But yet again – how do you determine the quality? What are the factors that could show you if one citation source is better than another? Here is a summary of what I think (the factors are not in particular order):

1. Number of the top ranking direct competitors having listings coming from the citation source.

There are numerous ways to discover what citations your competitors have and you can do this either manually, or use some local SEO tool(s). The best covered countries are United States, Canada, United Kingdom, and Australia.

2. Number of businesses from the same business line or the same locale being listed on the particular citation source.

I did a small-scale research on the topic some time ago, after which Darren Shaw and David Mihm did two larger-scale ones (by city and by category). Unfortunately, all these researches present data for the United States only.

3. General popularity of the site.

While this is hard to determine (sometimes even for Google), one way to look into the problem would be to see how often particular business directory is mentioned in high quality lists. I did a research on the subject some time ago.

4. History of containing structured business information.

If the website’s primary purpose is to store business information then what Google would be expecting to find while crawling it would be business information. This way the chances that the mention of your business would be picked up as a “citation” by the search engine would be higher.

5. Size of the business database.

While such information might be hard to find in some cases, the major business data providers do share it publicly. Bigger business database might mean both more complete overall business data, and higher trust points in Google’s “eyes”. One approach to solving this problem would be to look into how many of the website’s pages are indexed in the search engines. EZ Local have done a relevant research (for US directory sites only).

6. Distribution network.

Or how many other websites the business data is shared with. A large network would mean that listing your business on the main directory would result in it eventually showing up on hundreds of web properties. David Mihm has been doing incredible job sharing insights into these networks in the United States and Canada (for now).

7. Time for a citation to be picked up by Google.

There is little information on this subject in general, and Google is not really keen on sharing any. David Mihm and Mike Blumenthal have done an incredible research on this subject in the US context.

8. Overall web traffic to the directory.

Reliable and accurate data on this subject is hard to find. Andrew Shotland, using data from Compete, compiled a list based on the traffic to different US business directories.

9. Domain authority of the website.

Higher domain authority would be a another signal that particular website is reliable and has a good history in the search engines. Tools, such as Whitespark’s Local Citation Finder and Bright Local’s Citation Tracker measure this authority based on third-party data and own research work.

10. Availability of claiming and editing process.

Many business directories do not have automated (or any) processes in place for claiming or editing already existing listings. This is a potential prerequisite for lower quality business data, and such websites usually do not have (almost) any editorial staff.

11. Number of business information bits that could be added to a listing.

This is a factor that Google reportedly takes into account when determining the value and trustworthiness of a citation. It also makes sense from content richness point of view, because if the website allows for more business information to be added, it means that the chances for unique content on the page to be shared are higher.

Conclusion

Going back to the beginning of the article – my discussion with Ken was related to researching business directories in France (in case you missed it, I shared such researches for Canada, the UK, Australia, New Zealand, and Germany) and the difficulty in determining which ones would be most important and most worth it. Following the points outlined above, and with a decent amount of research, this problem could be solved for practically every market in the world.

Jan 092013
 

One year ago I published a list of the best local SEO and local SEM articles of 2011. Ever since, one of my dreams has been to turn this into a regular practice. And here we are – in the beginning of 2013, and I managed to compile a list of the best local-search-related pieces of the past year. The list consists of approximately 200 articles divided into 8 categories (clicking on the category name will take you to the corresponding part of the list):

General Local-Search-Related
Onsite Local SEO
Offsite Local SEO
Google Places and Google+ Local
Local Citations and Citation Building
Reviews and Reputation Management for Local Search
Non-Google Local Search (Bing, Yelp, Apple, Nokia, Yahoo)
Mobile-Local

I also included a list of some of the articles I published this year that you might find read-worthy:

My Articles

This article library holds a ton of wealthy information shared by the most renowned specialists in the industry, including Mike Blumenthal, David Mihm, Phil Rozek, Chris Smith, Miriam Ellis, Andrew Shotland, and many others. Happy reading!

General Local-Search-Related

Local Search Ranking Factors, Volume 5 (David Mihm, Own Blog)

10 Commandments of Local Search & the LSO Prophets (Cody Baird, Milkmen)

Your Local SEO Checklist for 2012! (Miriam Ellis, Search Engine Guide)

Big List of Local SEO’s To Follow On Google+ Some Thoughts (Mike Ramsey, Nifty Marketing)

Interview with Local Marketing Experts Jake Puhl & Adam Zilko (Eric Covino, SEO Book)

Best Local Search Tools – 2012 (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

Local Ranking Factors – Google Places Optimization (Bizible)

The Venice Shift from Local Pack to Blended Results (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

Finders Are Now Seekers: How Local Has Changed the Game (Gregg Stewart, Clickz)

Local Search “Pros” Breaking the Hippocratic Oath (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

Local SEO Tips from Darren Shaw of Whitespark (Eric Covino, SEO Book)

Essential Local Search Resources (Bryan Phelps, Whitespark)

Invisible Businesses In Google’s Local Search – The Problem No One Sees (Chris Smith, Search Engine Land)

The SMB Guide To Changing Business Names & SEO (Andrew Shotland, Search Engine Land)

The Long Tail of Local Search (Damian Rollison, Street Fight)

Deep Data and the Semantics of Local (Damian Rollison, Street Fight)

Who should care about Geo-Rankings and why? (Matt Roberts, Koozai)

How Can Local Search Better Serve Service-Oriented Businesses? (Damian Rollison, Street Fight)

Local Search Insights: What Are Consumers in Your Local Area Searching For? (Miranda Miller, Search Engine Watch)

50 Local SEO Lessons from 50 Clients (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

How Long Does Local-Search Visibility Take? (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

Relocation, Relocation, Relocation – A “New” Local Ranking Tactic? (Chris Smith, Search Engine Land)

The Rudiments Of Local SEO (Miriam Ellis, SEO Igloo Blog)

Memo to Google: Solve the Local Data Problem With Local Data (Damian Rollison, Street Fight)

Google Local: Train Wreck at the Junction (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

What Matt Cutts Says about Local Search (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

The Local Search Ecosystem in Canada (David Mihm, Own Blog)

Laying the Groundwork for a Local SEO Campaign (Eric Covino, SEO Book)

Local SEO as a Gateway Service (Eric Covino, SEO Book)

2013′s Top Local Search Ranking Factor: Honesty (Miriam Ellis, SEO Igloo Blog)

Local Search Dream Team – Tips, Tools & Predictions (Bryan Phelps, SEO.com)

The Venice Shift from Local Pack to Blended Results (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

The Zen Of Local SEO (Miriam Ellis, SEO Igloo Blog)

Insiders Guide To Selecting The Right Local SEO Tools (Myles Anderson, Search Engine Land)

Local SEO “Substitutions” (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

Matchmaking Advice for Local SEOs and Business Owners (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

How Google May Identify Implicitly Local Queries (Bill Slawski, SEO by the Sea)

How Business Names Might be Used by Google in Local Search Ranking Signals (Bill Slawski, SEO by the Sea)

 

Onsite Local SEO

Understand and Rock the Google Venice Update (Mike Ramsey, SEOmoz)

Local SEO: How Geotargeting Keywords Brought 333% More Revenue  (Adam Sutton, Marketing Sherpa)

The Local Search Plus Box (Nyagoslav Zhekov, Search Engine People)

Site audit: How can a local limousine service get found in dozens of cities? How can it stand out in the crowd? (Kathy Long, Own Blog)

The Hideous Site: An Allegory For Oddities In Local Search Results (Chris Smith, Search Engine Land)

The Anatomy of an Optimal Local Landing Page (Mike Ramsey, Nifty Marketing)

The Ugly State of Google SERPs: Rich Snippet Abuse (Mike Wilton, Search News Central)

How to Create Local Content for Multiple Cities (Matt McGee, Small Business SEM)

5 Local Blogging Ideas to Supercharge Your Local Marketing (Jessy Troy, Search Engine People)

13 Semantic Markup Tips For 2013: A Local SEO Checklist (Chris Smith, Search Engine Land)

Can Blogging Be Your Secret Weapon For Local SEO? (Chris Smith, Search Engine Land)

Using the Home Page to Improve Local Search Rankings (Chris Smith, Web Marketing Today)

Why Local Blogging Works (Matt McGee, Small Business SEM)

What Makes for a Good Author Photo in the Local Results? (Part 1) (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

What Makes for a Good Author Photo in the Local Results? (Part 2) (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

 

Offsite Local SEO

How to Use Driving Directions in Local Search SEO for Google Places (Ted Ives, Coconut Headphones)

Are Check-Ins A Local Ranking Factor? (Chris Smith, Search Engine Land)

5 Local Linkbuilding Ideas For The Post-Penguin/Panda Era (Andrew Shotland, Search Engine Land)

Culture Building: 8 Local Link Building Tactics Beyond Business Listings (Scott Dodge, Whitespark)

The Complete Guide to Link Building with Local Events (Kane Jamison, SEOmoz)

Link Building for Local Search (Julie Joyce, Search Engine Watch)

The PlaceRank Secret Behind Google’s Local Search Rankings (Chris Smith, Web Marketing Today)

5 Link Building Tactics to Improve Your Local Ranking (Matt Green, SEOmoz)

SEO: 7 Ways To Optimize For Local Rankings Via Images (Chris Smith, Web Marketing Today)

 

Google Places and Google+ Local

A Brief History of Google Places (David Mihm, Own Blog)

Best Google Places Troubleshooting Posts (2011 – Early 2012) (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

Interview With Google Places Help Forum Top Contributors: Blumenthal And Zhekov (Miriam Ellis, SEO Igloo Blog)

How to Pimp Your Google Places Listing (Phil Rozek, Whitespark Blog)

My Illustrated Plea To The Google Places Help Forum Team (Miriam Ellis, SEO Igloo Blog)

13 Best-Practices for Picking Google Places Business Categories (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

Why You May Need To Hide Your Google Places Address ASAP (Miriam Ellis, SEOmoz)

The Face of Google Places (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

5 Things You Should Not Do on Google Places (Nyagoslav Zhekov, Search Engine People)

The Google Places Purgatory and How to Get Out of It (Matthew Hunt, Small Business Online Coach)

Milestones in a Google Places Campaign That’s Working (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

12-Week Action Plan for Google Places Visibility (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

The Worst Kept “Secret” in Local Search: My Thoughts on the Impending Plus-Places Merge (David Mihm, Own Blog)

Google Places Description and More Details Section – Some News and Pro Opinions from the Field (Linda Buquet, Catalyst eMarketing)

Rankings on Google+ Local: Some Observations (David Mihm, Own Blog)

Google + Local: Q’s and some A’s (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

Google+ Local – What Wasn’t in the Announcement Was More Important Than What Was (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

Helping Or Hurting: The Debate Over Google+ Local (Jordan Kasteler, Search Engine Land)

Overcoming New Google Places Duplicate Listing Problems for Dentists, Doctors, Attorneys (Linda Buquet, Catalyst eMarketing)

Syncing Your Google Plus and +Local Pages: Plusses and Minuses (David Mihm, Own Blog)

The Suite Life of Google Plus Local Address Issues (Joseph Henson, Search Influence)

Why You May Need To Hide Your Google Places Address ASAP (Miriam Ellis, SEOmoz)

Google Tackles Geographic (Map) Spam for Businesses (Bill Slawski, SEO by the Sea)

Google Places Troubleshooting: Best Practice for Dealing with a Merged Listing (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

Many Google Places Searches Are Showing an Increased Radius For Search Results (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

Is Google’s New Requirement to Hide a Home Business Appropriate? (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

Google Places Pages Are No More – But What has Changed? (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

What Should Your Business Listing Categories Be in MapMaker (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

MapMaker Bots and What They Do (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

5 Google Places Tests I’d Love to See (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

 

Local Citations and Citation Building

How to Squeeze Maximum Google Places Love from GetListed.org Scans (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

The Local Search Ecosystem in 2012 (David Mihm, Own Blog)

6 Tools SMBs Can Use to Update Digital Directory Listings (Stephanie Miles, Street Fight)

Citation Consistency: The Key to Local Search Rankings (Chris Suppa, Thunder SEO)

The Best Citation Sources by U.S. City (David Mihm & Darren Shaw, GetListed)

Best “Events” Sites for Local Search Citations, Links, and Visibility (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

Local Citations: Another Signal Being Devalued by Google? (Mike Wilton, Search News Central)

Follow-up Study: The Best Citation Sources by Category (David Mihm & Darren Shaw, GetListed)

Can You Rank Well in Local Google without Revealing Your Street Address Anywhere? (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

Will Citations Stop Being Effective for Local Optimization in the Future? (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

5 Ridiculously Sneaky Citations Most Small Business Never Think to Get! (Matthew Hunt, Small Business Online Coach)

Infographic: Citations – Time To Live (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

The Role of Directories in the New Local Ecosystem (Damian Rollison, Street Fight)

Local Search: Understanding ‘Citations’ to Improve Rankings (Chris Smith, Web Marketing Today)

My Thoughts on Where Yext Fits Into a Local Search Marketing Plan (David Mihm, Own Blog)

SBSM Mailbag: Does Google Normalize NAP Data? (Name, Address, Phone) (Matt McGee, Small Business SEM)

Catching Up with your Local Competitors & Automating Citation Discovery (John-Henry Scherck, Seer Interactive)

Yext & Local SEO (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

Can a Citation Campaign Cause a Drop in Google Local Rankings? (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

Local Citations / Business Directories for Specific Ethnicities and Identities (US) (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

 

Reviews and Reputation Management for Local Search

Cold Hard Numbers on How Third-Party Reviews Help Google Places Rankings (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

21 Ways to Get Customer Reviews: the Ultimate List (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

Local Consumer Review Survey 2012 – Part 2 (Myles Anderson, Search Engine Land)

What Should You Tell A Client When Google Loses Their Reviews – A 4 Part Plan (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

Google Places Reviews – Critically Broken or Chronically Ignored? (Linda Buquet, Catalyst eMarketing)

Cheat Codes for Google+Local Customer Reviews (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

Google on Reviews: Asking for them is OK, Soliciting them is BAD (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

Asking for Reviews (Post Google Apocalypse) (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

FAQ about Local-Business Reviews (on Google+Local and Third-Party Sites) (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

9 Questions To Assess Your Review Management Stress Levels (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

Have You Been The Target Of A Google Places Hit Job? (Andrew Shotland, Search Engine Land)

The Local Business Reviews Ecosystem (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

 

Non-Google Local Search (Bing, Yelp, Apple, Nokia, Yahoo)

Yellow Pages Sites Beat Google In Local Data Accuracy Test (Greg Sterling, Search Engine Land)

5 “Local” Search Engines You Should Be Targeting (Chris Smith, Search Engine Land)

Bing Ties Yellow Pages Sites For Most Accurate Local Data (Greg Sterling, Search Engine Land)

IYP Ranking Factors: Getting Visible in Local-Biz Directories (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

10 Basic Bing Local Optimization Tips (Chris Smith, Search Engine Land)

Unofficial Apple Maps Frequently Asked Questions by Businesses (Andrew Shotland, Apple Maps Marketing)

How to Find Local Business Customers in Twitter (Kathy Long, Own Blog)

Yelp Ranking Factors (Phil Rozek, Local Visibility System)

6 Things to Know About the Yelp-Bing Local Data Partnership (Matt McGee, Small Business SEM)

Local SEO Blocking and Tackling for Siri & Apple Maps (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

Is Google’s Australian Data Partner Spamming Places for $11 a Listing? (Mike Blumenthal, Own Blog)

 

Mobile-Local

The Rise Of Local Mobile Pay-Per-Call – 3 Tips For SMBs (Bill Dinan, Search Engine Land)

Why It’s Time For Local SMBs To Get On Board With Mobile (Stephanie Hobbs, Search Engine Land)

 

My Articles

Interview with Dan Austin, a Google Maps Spam Fighter

Thoughts on Bizible’s Local Ranking Factors

Changes in Local Search – Implications on Local SEO

The Real Meaning of the Google Places Statuses

8 Ways to Recognize Fake Google Reviews

Local Citation Building Study Part 1: Niche-Relevant Local Citation Sources

Google Plus Local Rankings – What Changed and What Will Change

Local Citation Building Study Part 2: What the Pros Think

Local Citation Building Study Part 3: Plenitude of the Business Data

Local Citation Building Study Part 4: Local Business Directories Around the World (Canada and the UK)

Google+ Local vs. Map Maker. Is Your Business Eligible?

Local Citation Building Tools

Google with the Most Accurate Business Database in the UK

The Two Types of Local Search and How Local SEO Should Reflect Them

Local Citation Sources for Australia, Germany, and New Zealand

Why Yext Might Not Be the Best Fit for Your Business

Overcoming Google Local Listing Mergers with Additional Citations

How to Remove Duplicate Listings from Different Business Directories

Learning Local SEO from the Ones That Do It Best

How Google Might Be Determining If A Local Citation Is Spammy or Not

Dec 202012
 

Last week Bill Slawski covered a patent that has just been granted to Google, named “Determining spam in information collected by a source.” As it is immediately obvious from its name, the patent discusses methods for discovering spammy information coming from third-party sources. This seems to cover mostly (but apparently not limited to) business entities. Therefore, it would be safe to say that the patent discusses local citations and how a search engine might determine if the citation carries purposefully set incorrect information (spam). The two main ways, according to the patent, are:

- By measuring the “frequency of occurrence” of each phrase/element of the citation

- By measuring the “trustworthiness” of each source

I will not dabble further into the explanations of how each of these two factors are counted and how the whole system works, but I’d rather focus on the practical implications.

What It Tackles

Google obviously would like to present the most accurate and complete information to its users. This is possible only if it obtains this information from as many sources as possible. However, some of these sources might sometimes provide inaccurate or even spammy information, so Google needs methods to find it. Some obvious examples of information Google would rather completely disregard are telephone number in the business name, mentions of words such as “discount”, “sales”, etc. In other cases it might be more difficult for Google to understand if particular content is correct or not. An example would be “[Business Name] in [City]“, or even worse – “[City] [Business Name]” (as in Miami Printing, which is the actual name of a real business).

The patent gives examples mostly related to the category of the business, but I believe the practical implications are mostly related to the business name. It is a known and widely approved fact that the business name plays role in how Google ranks the local search results (see factors #15 and #22 here). That is why over the years many have adopted the bad practice (intentionally or not) to add extraneous keywords to the business name in their Google local listings. When Google started getting stricter, the “practitioners” (predominantly black hat SEOs) got smarter and started creating citations with the business name including the keywords. That way the third-party data would support the information the “business owner” submits via Google Places.

The Threats

Reading through the patent, two major threats occur in my mind:

1) The main one is that Google seems to rely a lot (probably too much) on information coming from “trusted sources” (according to the patent a source can be designated “as a trusted source based on, for example, a reputation of the source or previous dealings with the source or combinations of them”). This means that it is theoretically possible that if a source is trustworthy enough, it is possible that Google might take the information from this source for granted and would never disregard it or check its accuracy. Examples of such sources would be LocalEze and Infogroup/CityGrid in the USA, and YellowPages.ca in Canada. Translated in local SEO language this means that it is possible that if a listing is added to LocalEze (for example) and the same business information is not found anywhere else on the web, Google might still create a new listing using this information. This obviously opens up a big hole in the described system, because Google would be very dependent on such third-party trusted sources. And it is important to mention that many of these potentially trusted sources have close to no mechanisms for checking the authenticity of the business information added to their databases (other than phone verifications, which is an insufficiently reliable method).

2) My other concern is related to businesses that actually do have such words (regarded as spam) in their business names, websites, or even physical addresses. How Google has historically been dealing with such situations is they were withholding the activation of a listing that contains such words (the biggest publicly available list of these is here) and they have manually been verifying the accuracy of the information. However, according to the patent even words such as city names could be considered spammy, which opens up a broad field for false positives.

What This Means from Local SEO Point of View

As mentioned above, there are two main factors taken into account – trustworthiness and frequency. While the patent doesn’t discuss these factors in regards with organic search rankings, it could be assumed that similar methodology is used when determining the value of citations and how business listings are ranked. This means that we could distinguish between two types of local citation sources:

1. Qualitatively-important – such as the aforementioned LocalEze, Infogroup, CityGrid, Yellowpages, etc.

2. Quantitatively-important – either less authoritative or less-probable-to-be-citation-sources sources.

To have a strong “citation profile”, you must cover the first type of sources, and just after this you should proceed with looking for further volumes and opportunities. At the same time while 2. could be useless without 1., 1. would be (in many cases) insufficient without 2.

Conclusive Words

I believe Google has been using this (or similar) method to detect and disregard spammy information coming from third-party sources at least for some time. Nevertheless, the patent comes to shed further light on the systems Google adopts to find, compile, and process business information.

Nov 262012
 

We already have an FAQ page for our citation building service on our site, but I felt there are some more general questions that do not fit into that page, and would be better off discussed in a post form. I share the questions in order of frequency of poppingup-ness (if there is such a word):

1) Do you verify the information I am sending to you?
Yes! We always check what you are sending to us in terms of information. Some of the most common mistakes we face are:
- business name is not the one that is most frequently used online
- categories are simply keywords (such as “helicopter” or “Las Vegas”), rather than phrases that explain what your business is (such as “helicopter flights”, “personal injury attorney”, etc.)

2) Why do you NOT offer citation building for more than 100 citations?
The most important reason is that in the vast majority of the cases doing over 100 citations via creating business listing profiles is an overkill. The high quality business directories in the United States are 50-60, and there are around the same number mid-quality business directories. These numbers are lower for other countries. Additionally, there are very rarely businesses that do have more than 100 citations coming from business listing profiles. Those with more usually get them from non-traditional citation sources, such as online newspaper/magazine articles, event websites, sponsoring, etc.

3) How do you deal with businesses that use home address as their business address?
If you are really worried about your home address showing up publicly anywhere, we try to hide it whenever possible. Most of the “big” business directories allow this. Some of the “smaller” ones do not, but their overall traffic is insignificantly small and the chances for a real customer knocking on your door after discovering your address on some of these is minimal.

4) I moved to a new office, can you help me?
You bet! While you have no problems with us, you might be having some problems with Google. However, we have very positive history of helping companies update their address everywhere across the web, which also helps when it comes to changing the address on Google+ Local.

5) Will you be able to edit all my listings?
While we always do our best to fix all listings, in some cases it is just impossible. There are websites, which “scrape” business information from other sites. These websites are usually not being managed by anyone and there is no way to contact their owner. Additionally, there are some websites that simply lack the functionality of removing business listings, because the data is coming from a third-party. Altogether, these websites usually represent not more than 10% of the citations for a business.

6) Do you offer citation building for my type of business?
Very probably YES. We have done citation building for over 50 different types of businesses spanning from bankruptcy lawyers to film production companies. Our clients include companies from United States (every state), Canada, Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Ireland, Holland, Spain, Germany, Sweden.

7) Do you offer citation building strategies, other than submitting to business directories?
We do offer this as part of our local SEO service. However, due to its specifics, we do not offer citation building strategizing as a stand-alone service.

8) What is the advantage of your service over me doing it by myself (business owner) or us doing it in-house (large company or a marketing agency)?
The biggest advantage is our experience, as well as the cost effectiveness of our service. The two things are actually interconnected – our experience allows us to reduce the time it takes us to make sure we offer highest quality citation building, thus lowering the overall price. We do everything in-house and we do not outsource to sub-contractors in other countries.

9) Do you offer citation building for businesses with many locations?
Absolutely! We have completed projects for national companies with hundreds of locations.

10) Do you offer citation building for Apple Maps?
Apple Maps does not actually use citations as a ranking factor. As long as you are listed on the main data providers for Apple Maps you would be fine. These include Yelp, Localeze, Acxiom, so in this sense we do offer some sort of “citation building” for Apple Maps.

11) We are a doctor/dentist practice and we all use the same address and phone number. What would you recommend?
I would recommend that you go with citation building for both the practice, and each of the practitioners. Check my reasoning and methodology here.

12) I have some listings that do not feature my suite number in the address. Would you fix these for me?
We would be happy to help you if this really means a lot to you. However, if you want to do this just because you are worried that not all of your listings feature absolutely the same information which could harm your rankings – don’t. Mike Blumenthal laid out “why” pretty well here.

If you think you don’t see something that might be of interest unanswered, please, let me know.

Nov 082012
 

A couple of weeks ago Sergiu Draganus demoed to me a new tool that his team is building  – Local SERP Checker. What the tool does is basically displaying the first page results for particular keywords, simulating what users in specific cities would see if searching for those keywords. The tool provides both the “raw” list of ranking pages and an organized heat map (I am a fan of those) that shows pages from what domains rank across different locations:

Click to enlarge

The tool has the ability to display both organic and paid Geo-localized results for one or more keywords at a time. This provides the interesting opportunity to research and compare the difference between local intent keywords with and without Geo-modifier in the search query:

Click to enlarge

The tool can be used in a number of different ways for local SEO research purposes:

1. Discovering high ranking domains across different locations, which supplemented with further research of these high ranking domains could point to typical features and best practices that could be used in one’s own local SEO strategy.

2. Discovering local link prospects – indirect competitors, in the same niche but targeting different location could turn into valuable link prospects.

3. Local citations sources – I have previously discussed researching local citation sources and their relevance to a niche/location based on how they rank, and the Local SERP Checker tool can make this work much easier.

4. Competition analysis – as the tool provides the option to perform checks for a big number of keywords at the same time, this could help understand who the major local competitors are.

Some additional features include checking localized SERPs across countries, as well as simulating the localized rankings from the “viewpoint” of a mobile user.

Currently it is impossible to choose which cities one would like to choose to see the localized rankings for (the cities are predefined), but this is a feature that will be added during the next update (within 2 weeks, according to Sergiu). Other features that are on the way include keyword monitoring and alerts, keyword suggestion tool, integration with Google Maps, and advanced local link prospecting analysis reports.

The Local SERP Checker currently has a free version, as well as a number of paid plans.

Oct 312012
 

Merging of two separate listing and the appearing of duplicate listings are two of the longest term problems with Google’s local listings. They are basically the product of the same problem: the local data threshold. This threshold determines what percentage matching information should be present in order for new incoming data to get merged with data already existing in Google’s business information database. If this threshold is passed the data is merged. If it is not – a new cluster of data (listing) is created.

Here is an example that illustrates this better:

Home remodeling company “Bob the Builder” has a listing on Google+ Local (ex- Google Places). They are located in Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Here is how the information in their listing looks like:

Name: Bob the Builder
Address: 11 Main Street #100, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Phone: 909-909-9090
Categories: home remodeling, home renovation, home restoration

Unfortunately, they also use another phone number to do business, and this is the mobile of the owner – Bob Sponge. Therefore, there are a couple of listings across the web that feature this phone number. The first one is on Yellowpages.com and looks like this:

Name: Bob the Builder
Address: 11 Main Street #100, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Phone: 909-555-5555
Categories: home remodeler

The second one is on Superpages.com and looks like this:

Name: Bob Sponge at Bob the Builder
Address: 11 Main Street #100, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Phone: 909-555-5555
Categories: home renovation and restoration, home remodeling

There are additionally 20 other listings across the web that feature the correct information (the same that is found on Google+ Local).

Here is what Google does:

1. It indexes these pages and finds that they are business listings. As these also feature structured data it is easier for Google to determine what is what (i.e. what is the business name, what is the address, etc).

2. Google collects this data and goes to its business information database and searches for matching information.

3. It doesn’t find exact matching information. But what it does is it makes a second attempt attempt to find partially matching information. What would happen if it didn’t take this additional step? Then practically every business in the world would have at least one duplicate on Google.

4. Google finds out that the match between the Yellowpages listing and the Google listing in terms of NAP (name, address, phone) is 66%. Additionally, it finds out that the categories are almost perfectly matching, so it also considers them a match. So the chances that the information is for the same business are very high, and Google determines that “well, we will simply merge this data with the already existing one.” In such cases, if you go to the listing on MapMaker, you would be able to see the two alternative phone numbers listed there.

5. The case with Superpages is a little more complicated, though. The address matches, and the categories too, but the business name is just a partial match, and the phone number is completely different. And here comes the doubt – should this information be merged, or should a completely new listing be created? And the answer depends on the situation and a few different variables Google takes into account:

A) Which is the website that features this information? Is it reputable? Does it have a history of storing wrong information? Does it have a history of storing fake information? What is its relevancy to the industry the business operates in?

B) How many matching records there are on other websites and which are these websites, i.e. are they part of the network of the primary source website, or are they sourcing information independently?

In this case, the answer to the first question is generally positive in favor of Superpages. It is a reputable site and it has editorial history of featuring generally good business data. So if Google was to take just this into account, then a duplicate listing was most probably going to be created. However, they are smarter than this, so they go on and check if this information shows up anywhere else on the web. In the case in question – it doesn’t. So what Google would most probably do is:

- Either ignore the information altogether, because there is insufficient supporting matching information from other sources,
- Or merge this data with the one in the listing, giving prevalence to the more prominent data, i.e. the data that appears more often across the web.

It would be most probable that the second case would happen if the Yellowpages listing’s data has previously been associated with the Google listing, because then Google would know that phone number 909-555-5555 is an alternative phone number of Bob the Builder, thus the match with the Superpages data would be stronger.

This is a simple example of how Google takes decisions in regards with local business listings data. A more complicated one would include a doctor, or dental practice, where each practitioner has a listing, and the practice itself also has a listing. A lot has been written about this problem in the last months, and here are some general best practices:

- Obvious one – claim each listing and make sure all the information is correct and up-to-date;

- Do not include the practice’s name as part of the practitioners’ business names, i.e. do not do this: “Your Eyes Clinic: Dr. John Nakamura”;

- Try to add different, unique categories for each practitioner and the practice, do not repeat them across more than 1 listing;

- Use specific landing pages for each practitioner and the practice.

Unfortunately, these might very well not be enough and Google might decide to still merge the listings. Why? Because it might not have enough supporting information that each of these is a separate entity, and thus doesn’t “deserve” to be merged with another one. The way to overcome this is obvious – provide enough supporting information to Google (create local citations), a.k.a. prove it that these are separate entities.

Why I actually recommend that you create listings for the practice AND each of the practitioners

If you don’t do it, Google will sooner or later do it for you. And you cannot escape from it, because many of the specialized medical/law business directories allow only for profiles of practitioners to be added. If you do it instead of leaving the job to Google, you would have better control over what is happening and you would be aware of when something is happening. The problem some would see here is that the practitioners’ listings could “cannibalize” the rankings of the practice, because Google might incorrectly associate part (or all) of the citations with the listings of the practitioners. This can easily be overcome if citations are created for each of the practitioners, in addition to creating them for the practice. Here is an example:

If the practice “Your Eyes Clinic” has only one listing on Yelp.com, and it is for the practice itself, the chances that Google would associate this listing (a citation) with a Google listing for some of the practitioners is much higher compared to the case where there are listings for both the practice AND for each practitioner on Yelp.com.

Conclusion

Creating additional local citations helps Google determine if a listing is for a separate entity, the same way it helps Google when you start clearing up duplicate or incorrect listings across the web. Doing it would not only save you from unwanted mergers, but also help in the rankings of each of the entities. After all who wouldn’t like to have the search results for “doctors Chicago” show 3 or 4 listings related to their practice – one for the practice itself (hopefully at the top), and a few others for each of the doctors?

Oct 092012
 

Duplicate listings can very easily turn into the plague of the online marketing of every local business. They not only often feature old or incorrect and misleading information, but could also potentially “transmit” this information to other sites, thus spreading it throughout the whole ecosystem and ultimately reaching Google’s local data cluster, which could be devastating for business’s local search rankings. Unfortunately, getting rid of such duplicates has proven to be more difficult than any other process related to local listings – adding, claiming, or editing them. Additionally, there is currently no automated service that deals with this problem, so manual clean-up is the only way to go.

Why removing duplicates is so difficult?

There are a few main reasons for this:

1) Making it easy for people and businesses to remove listings from a business directory could very easily backfire and cause the loss of data that has been paid for. Therefore, it is not of the websites’ own interest to offer such a service.

2) Many business directories lack the technology to solve complicated problems with business data and prefer to ignore them rather than invest into trying to fix them (Google itself is an example of a company that has been ignoring the importance and complexity of the problem for way too long).

3) While websites might lack the technology to solve the problem with duplicate listings, they might also lack the human resources to maintain the process via some sort of customer service.

These, together with the fact that many websites are left without (almost) any editorial backing make the process tedious and frustrating. I myself am dealing with it daily and I have a list of good practices for removing duplicate listings on a number of the most important business directories on the web and as I know many others share the same burden I am sharing a few tips here.

Which websites am I covering here and why?

I will definitely not cover the whole list of business directories (note: this article covers predominantly US business directories), but just the ones I consider to be of the highest importance and at the same time have a rather troublesome process of listings removal, plus the ones where I normally find the highest numbers of duplicate listings.

Yelp

The site is notorious for the problems it causes to businesses when they want to remove their listings, usually for the purpose of getting their negative reviews gone, too. In the majority of the cases the answer coming from Yelp is “No”. However, there is a mechanism to get this done in the cases when the listing is a duplicate. You simply have to go to the contact form and choose “Duplicate business listing” from the drop-down menu. After this you’d need to use the search option to locate the two listings – the original one you’d want to keep, and the duplicate one and select them. Normally these get solved within 1-2 weeks.

Citysearch

The site, while hosting one of the largest business databases, has no official system for getting duplicates removed. The fastest way to deal with the problem would be to send them an email at myaccount@citygridmedia.com. Unfortunately, answers are not regular and frequent, so it might take some time and a few attempts to get this done. Another way, which is unofficial and might take you to a sales agent rather than to the desired destination (hopefully a customer service rep or a tech), is to call the company’s phone number 800-611-4827.

Superpages

Similarly to Citysearch, Superpages does not have a system in place to get duplicate listings removed. The best way I’ve found to get this resolved is by calling the customer service phone number: 800-428-8722.

Yahoo! Local

Yahoo’s mechanism is pretty clear when it comes to listing removal (unlike the mechanism for getting a listing verified). You have to go to the Local Listing Removal Request Form, choose “Business Moved” from the drop-down menu, and fill in the form.  Then it usually takes about 2-4 weeks for the listings to be taken down.

MapQuest

The process is again rather simple (once you discover where to start, of course): simply go to the Report an Issue page, tick “Business Listing/Location Issue” and describe the problem in the box at the bottom.

LocalEze

To get a listing “closed” you’d first need to verify your ownership over it. After you are done with that, you’d need to go to the “Manage Listings” dashboard and under “More Actions”, click on “Close Listing”:

Yellowbot

This one is a bit more complicated. You’d need to locate the duplicate listing and click on “Help us make it right” at the bottom of the page (note that you’d first need to register to the website, because you will be practically sending a user edit). On the next page, scroll to the bottom and click on “Submit corrections” and a window will be prompted asking if you are the business owner. Answer with a “No”. At the next page choose “Duplicate” from the drop-down and in “Reason for change” box fill in the URL to the original, correct listing.

MerchantCircle

This is my “favorite” in terms of number of duplicate listings. This is one of the reasons why I was so amazed to see it topping this research by Yext. The mechanism for removing those is, however, relatively easy. You have to go to the Remove a Business Listing, search for the duplicate(s), and after this simply mark them and send them for deletion. All this seems fine, but unfortunately, according to my experience the site is very slow at taking action on these reports and at the same time they are virtually unreachable via phone or email.

HotFrog

The mechanism for removing a listing is very well outlined in the FAQ of the site, so I will just cite it here:

“If you do want to leave though, login and click on ‘My account’ once you’ve logged into the dashboard. From there click on ‘Remove your free profile’ and follow the instructions.”

Therefore, you’d need to first have the listing claimed before being able to delete it.

EZLocal

The site does not have a system in place for removing duplicates, but calling customer service at 877-416-2378 and looking for Denise has proven to be a very nice and easy way to solve one’s problems.

Ones I haven’t Discovered Solution for

Besides these there are a couple of more websites, which often feature incorrect duplicate listings – Citysquares.com and GetFave.com. Unfortunately, my attempts to find a solution to this problem have always failed up to now. It appears that the easiest way to get this issue fixed is by simply editing the duplicate(s), including the correct information in each of them.

Have you had problems with removing a listing from some of these websites, or from other ones? Have you solved them in some more effective ways?

*Note: Our Citation Building Guide features more information, tips, and tactics on how to deal with duplicate listings and data consistency.

Sep 252012
 

Here comes the time to complete a promise I gave a while ago. In the article “Local Citation Building Study Part 4: Local Business Directories Around the World (Canada and the UK)” from June 19 this year I claimed that I was going to be delivering a two-part piece related to the most important business directories and citation sources in Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and New Zealand. The first part covered Canada and the UK, and the time finally came for the second part. Without any further blabbering, here are the top citation sources for Australia, Germany, and New Zealand:

1. Local Citation Sources for Australia

I used a number of great sources for this part of the citation sources study:

The Guide to Australian Citations for Local Search (by David Mihm)

The Definitive List of Local Search Citations – Australia Citation Sites (by Phil Rozek)

Local Google Places Citations – Australian (by Robert Steers)

Citation Sources for Google+ Local in Australia (by Local Lead)

Top 10 Local Citations Every Australian Business Should Have (Lyka Winnett)

And here is the list of the best business directories for Australia:

Yellowpages.com.au – similarly to the case with Canada, Yellowpages is probably the strongest business data player in the market (excluding Google, of course). It provides business information to both Google and Bing.

TrueLocal.com.au – a very close competitor to Yellowpages, it is not only one of the most detailed business directories in Australia, but also provides business data for the Yahoo Local’s equivalent in Australia.

StartLocal.com.au

Yelp.com.au

Hotfrog.com.au

Whitepages.com.au

Aussieweb.com.au

Local.com.au

dLook.com.au

Citysearch.com.au

Manta.com

Superpages.com.au

CityHobo.com

POIDB.com

1Australia.org

Aussielocal.com.au

Fyple.biz

WoMo.com.au

LocalBusinessGuide.com.au

AussieLocal.com.au

RaveAboutIt.com.au

Eatability.com.au

2. Local Citation Sources for Germany

There are very few lists of business directories for Germany, but fortunately all that exist are very robust. These are:

Branchenbuch Liste für den Citation Aufbau (by Another Vision)

Webkatalog-Webverzeichnis-Branchenbuch Liste (by Deutscher Webkatalog)

Branchenbuch – die bekanntesten und größten Branchenbücher (by Deutscher Webkatalog)

Branchenbuch Eintrag (by Eisy)

And here is the list itself:

Gelbeseiten.de – this is the equivalent of Yellowpages.com in Germany. It has arguably the largest business information database in the country as it sources data both from the national telecommunications provider (Deutsche Telekom) and with local and industry-specific websites.

StadtBranchenbuch.com – the site is part of the international network of Opendi, which has yellow pages and white pages sites in 29 countries with data for an overall of 25 million entities.

KennstDuEinen.de – while this is not one of the top 3 largest business directories in Germany, I’d feature it mostly because of the magnificent blog, dedicated to local search, which the site supports.

GoYellow.de

Pointoo.de

Lokale-Telefonbuchwerbung.de

Yellowmap.de

Suchen.de

Yasni.de

Hotfrog.de

Blaue-Branchen.de

Branchenbuch.MeineStadt.de

Klicktel.de – and its partner 11880.com

Cylex.de

Branchenbuchsuche.de

Branchenorte.de

Gelbex.de

Nelso.de

Yellow1.de

Andoo.de

Branchenbuchdeutschland.de

Regioseiten.de

Gelbesbranchebuch.de

Branchen-Domain.de

Unternehmensauskunft.com

Branchenkatalog.de

LokaleAuskunft.de

Branchencenter.de

Telefonbuch.com

3. Local Citation Sources for New Zealand

As you could predict, the list here would not be as long as the previous ones. The information sources are also scarce, and they run out with:

List Of The Best Free New Zealand Business Directories Online (by Sheldon Nesdale)

NZ Online Directories: List Of ALL the Free Online New Zealand Business Directories (by Sheldon Nesdale)

That is why some of the websites mentioned below come from my personal research work and are not based on any third-party source. Here they are:

Finda.co.nz – this is by far the most important business directory in New Zealand. They are an official partner of Google, and similarly to Yellowpages.ca in Canada and Yellowpages.com.au in Australia the remark “Business listings provided by Finda™” shows up under some search results via maps.google.co.nz.

Yellow.co.nz – the second most important site in the country of the Kiwis. It is the Yellowpages.com of New Zealand.

Whitepages.co.nz

HotFrog.co.nz

UBD.co.nz

Zenbu.co.nz

ZipLeaf.co.nz

Gopher.co.nz

2CU.co.nz

Localist.co.nz

NZSBDirectory.co.nz

iLook.co.nz

Bonus: Best Business Directories and Citation Sources in Other Countries

In order to show that I am actually a cool guy (surprising I know), I add lists with the top 5 business directories for Ireland, Spain, the Netherlands, and South Africa.

1) Local Citation Sources in Ireland:

Yabsta.ie

Yalwa.ie

Fyple.net

Cylex.ie

SaySo.ie

2) Local Citation Sources in Spain:

11870.com

Yelp.es

Salir.com

Metroo.es

Opiname.es

3) Local Citation Sources in the Netherlands:

Opendi.nl

HotFrog.nl

MisterWhat.nl

Yelp.nl

Telefoonboek.nl

4) Local Citation Sources in South Africa:

Yellowpages.co.za

Cylex.co.za

HotFrog.co.za

Brabys.com

SAYellow.co.za

Final Words

As you might have noticed sometimes the top directories in different countries are either the same, or under the same company. The most prominent cases are:

- Manta.com – offers free and paid listings for businesses from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia (I’ve previously praised Manta here). Additionally, they provide detailed business data for practically every country in the world, so it might not be too far until they open their listings program to everyone.

- Brownbook.net – simiarly to Manta, they offer business data for every country in the world, but they also allow all listings to be claimed and edited.

- HotFrog – the network operates in 38 countries, hosting over 69 million business listings (source)

- Opendi – the network operates in 29 countries, and hosts 25 million listings (source)

- Cylex – the company has “over 30 online business directories… reaching out to 5 continents” (source)

- Yelp – one of the most popular business websites in the United States, it has overall 17 international branches, including the recently added Yelp.com.sg

- Yalwa – the company operates websites in 38 countries around the world (source)

It is very possible that at least some of these are available in your country, too (in case it is not covered by some of my articles).

I am always looking for ways to improve these lists, so if you have any ideas I’d be happy to hear them either in the comments section or via email at nyagoslav.zhekov@gmail.com.

*Note: Our Citation Building Guide features more information, tips, and tactics on how to do local citation building.

Sep 032012
 

There have been a lot of opinions expressed on the importance of Yext for local SEO (you can read Mike Blumenthal’s and David Mihm’s, for instance). However, I haven’t seen anyone tackling the more fundamental problems behind the platform. I will try to explain some of them in more detail. In this article, I will try to explain them in more details. But first, I should make a clear disclaimer – I do offer manual citation building service, which might be viewed as a “competing” service to the Yext’s core one (although I would argue on this matter, but that’s not the point). Nevertheless, everything I write is from as a neutral point of view as possible.

What does Yext offer?

Yext offers a service called “Power Listings”, which syndicates business information across a network of 40 local search platforms. These platforms include both Internet yellow pages types of sites, such as Yahoo Local, Superpages, Whitepages, Local.com, and social network and review types of sites, such as Yelp, Citysearch, Foursquare, and others. The service includes a neat dashboard, which monitors traffic to each of the listings, as well as reviews on them. However, the biggest advantage of Yext has always been the speed with which the information is being spread and/or rectified across the network.

What are the positives?

As I mentioned above, the speed with which the information is being synced is unique. For most of the sites it goes live practically instantly, and for almost all of the others it gets updated in a few hours. Additionally, the information that could be syndicated includes special offers, photos, and videos, and some of these elements are not available on a number of the local search sites, even for paying customers, i.e. the only way to get them to appear on one’s listing is via Yext. The statistics that the platform provides could also be valuable, especially when considering the service’s value.

What are the negatives?

The positives pretty much end with what I described above. Here is a list of some of the most significant negatives:

1) Service’s updates – Yext’s service is in an ever-going improvement, which by itself is great. New sites are regularly being added to the network. But what happens if you have purchased a package when the network consisted of only 12-13 platforms? As far as I understand, you are going to stay only with these for at least until your one year’s subscription ends. I understand that from Yext’s point of view that makes sense – they don’t have to pay a bulk sum of money to the newly added to the network sites, because of some old customers that would anyway not pay anymore (at least for a year) after their initial payment. However, it totally doesn’t make sense from the point of view of these customers. And if I were them, I was going to be unhappy with the service, too.

2) The network - while Yext’s network includes a number of the most important business directories, it also misses a few important ones. These include Yellowpages, Insiderpages, Kudzu, Manta, to name a few. Furthermore, the network’s size is very small compared to the overall number of local business directories out there. Whitespark‘s Local Citation Finder finds 245 citation sources per keyphrase on average. Of course, some of these are unusable, or not business directories, but even if 50% of them are, this would mean that in any given niche there are at least 100-120 business directories, where a business could get a listing from. Yext’s network covers 40, but this number is rather questionable. A couple of examples: 411.com and Switchboard.com which are advertised as platforms part of the service, actually get data directly from Whitepages and Superpages, respectfully, and there is no way for a business to get a listing on any of them directly. Furthermore, the service won’t work in the cases when one has an enhanced listing for their business on some of the most important websites: Yahoo, Yelp, Superpages, Citysearch, Local.com, Merchantcircle, Ziplocal, Tupalo.

3) NAP consistency – the main advantage of the service is that it rectifies the business information across Yext’s network, thus helping up the local search rankings (I have previously discussed the value of citations for local SEO). I have been “promoting” the Local Search Scorecard, an instant scanning service Yext offers for free, as a useful local SEO tool, too. But if we look deeper, we could see that there are fundamental problems with the Power Listings service and its helpfulness in terms of keeping one’s business NAP consistent. How the service works is:

- It scans all the network’s websites for the specified business information (name, address, phone number).

- It determines the best matching listings (if any) on each website and highlights them.

- It then syncs the data input via the dashboard on all these websites, updating the listings that previously have been determined as best matching, and “filling in” with new listings where it was unable to find matching ones.

The three main problems here – first, it is possible that Yext’s scanning will not find the correct listing (happens often when the same business has two offices in the same city, or when a business has been using the same phone number for more than one of their locations); second, it is possible that Yext’s scanning will not find any listing, although there is one (happens if NAP is very inconsistent); third, it is possible that there are duplicates, and as Yext finds only one listing per website, these won’t be taken care of (happens almost in every single case). What this all means is that the chances for Yext to not clear up your NAP completely, or to actually screw your other location’s NAP, are pretty high. I haven’t made a large scale research on this matter, but according to my observations there are at least a few wrong or correct duplicates for a business in at least 80% of the cases. The sites with most duplicate listings (not just from Yext’s network, but overall) are Merchant Circle, Citysquares, EZLocal, MojoPages, ZipLocal, which are in fact all part of the network. Additionally, at least in one of every 5 or 6 searches via the Local Search Scorecard, Yext finds at least one listing which is either for another business, or for another location of the same business. Last but not least, in almost every search, Yext’s tool doesn’t find at least one listing on one website, where it actually exists.

4) The overall price – the rate is $500 per year. It is advertised as “per month” rate, but it is billed per year. Personally, I believe for what Yext offers the price is rather steep. Here is a sum up of why I think so:

- Yext basically offers a service, which syndicates business data across 40 platforms.

- 3 platforms actually are part of a network of other platforms, and by themselves do not carry almost any value.

- 8 platforms are not compatible with Yext when the business is already advertising on them.

- Yext doesn’t remove duplicates.

- Yext sometimes syndicates data where there is an already existing listing for a business, thus creating a duplicate.

- Yext sometimes updates a wrong listing, thus potentially screwing up the business data for another location.

- Here is one I haven’t mentioned yet: the listings coming from Yext are not owner-verified (in almost all cases), and as the incoming data is standardized, sometimes the listings produced by Yext are not fully completed (here is why it is important for the listings to be as complete as possible).

Conclusion

I do not say Yext is bad. On the contrary, it has many positives, as I pointed out above. It could be very useful and time-saving for businesses with thousands of locations, where manual citations work is simply impossible. It could also be useful for businesses that have higher profit per sale (real estate agencies, insurance agencies, law firms, car dealers) that have opened a new location and want a fast local search boost. However, I don’t think it’s really useful in the cases when:

- You are a small business, with not too high profit per sale, or not too large marketing budget;

- You are a business of any size that has already taken care of their online presence (i.e. your business data is relatively consistent across the board);

- You are a business of any size with significant business data inconsistency problems (very often the case with most of the professional and health related businesses);

- You want a local SEO push, and you are looking for ways to stand above the competition (in these cases, normally the competitor(s) will already have listings on most of the websites included in Yext’s network, so if your only citation building tactic is paying for Power Listings, then this might very well not be the right solution for you).

Time for discussion – have you used Yext? What was your case and has Yext’s service helped?

Update

Howard Lerman, CEO of Yext, contacted me with his POV, and as I always appreciate companies caring about their reputation + sharing as many views as possible, I post his thoughts below:

I usually enjoy reading your posts and comments as you tend to get the detailed facts actually right.

Unfortunately, your article post Yext today does not meet the Zhekov high standard I have come to expect from you!

Specifically, in your “What are the negatives / 3) NAP Consistency” section, you’ve missed a major, key step in the Yext process. We don’t use the same matches from our scan as the official match to sync with. Rather, upon purchasing our product, we first suggest matches and unless it is an exact match, a business quickly walks through a process for each listing where they have the chance to confirm a match OR re-search on the partners index until they find the listing they’d like to match to. If the listings not there, we add it.

The ability to pick which listing on each site you’d like to sync with Yext is a very powerful feature – no other solution has anything even close to this capability.

I think the entire nature of your article (including the headline) is unfair without this criticism. Your remaining criticisms are that we don’t have enough sites and that we’re too expensive. We’re always adding more sites and stay tuned in that regard. That leaves expense. How much does an average LocalSEO charge per hour? How much junk is there in the market that costs hundreds or thousands of dollars? For a business investing in internet advertising, Yext is very reasonably priced.

*Note: Our Citation Building Guide features more information, tips, and tactics on how to do local citation building.